The Bizarre Reason This Man Became President Of The USA For Just One Day

You may dream of being the President of the United States, but the job isn’t for the faint-hearted. You’d have to be the leader of the country for at least four years – unless you chose to resign, of course. What if you were president for just one day, though? Could you cope? Well, apparently, one man knew exactly what that was like.

It all began back in March 1849 – a time when the United States was just a decade away from civil war. But before the conflict that would come to define America, another far less famous incident occurred. In Washington, D.C., a bizarre series of events unfolded, leaving one individual with a very unusual claim to fame.

Yep, according to some historians, this man was president of the United States for a solitary day. But how did such an unusual tenure come about? And what acts did this all-too-brief leader manage to squeeze into such a short term? He’s unlikely to have effected any lasting policy change, after all, so what does America have to remember him by?

ADVERTISEMENT

Well, most folks don’t actually remember this guy – or have even learned about him in the first place. Years ago, though, his presidency was a hotly debated topic. And while his name may be unfamiliar today, the man at the heart of this strange story still occupies a unique place in the history of the United States. That means you should know about him.

Of course, there have been other U.S. presidents in office for surprisingly brief periods. Take William Henry Harrison, for example. He was the ninth man to run the country and was 67 years old when he stood against Democrat Martin Van Buren in the election of 1840.

ADVERTISEMENT

Naturally, Harrison beat out Van Buren, making him both the oldest person and the earliest member of the Whig Party to have been named president at the time. And after his inauguration on March 4, 1841, he relocated to Washington and settled into White House life. But, unfortunately, Harrison’s time in power was to prove short-lived.

ADVERTISEMENT

Just three weeks on from his inauguration, Harrison contracted pneumonia. And even though doctors tried to save him, he ultimately passed away in the first week of April – meaning, all in all, he was president for just 31 days. Historians have therefore recorded his time in the office as the briefest on record. But as we’ll see, there’s a challenger to this claim.

ADVERTISEMENT

Or what about James A. Garfield, who was elected president exactly 40 years after Harrison? The 20th man to take on the role, he’d been in office for just a few months when he was shot in the back and arm by the troubled lawyer Charles J. Guiteau. Though Garfield survived the attack, he eventually succumbed to the sepsis that resulted from the lacerations he’d suffered.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yes, just a couple of months after the shooting, Garfield passed away, having spent only half a year as president of the United States. But what of the man who was in office for a mere fraction of this time? Was he too the victim of a nefarious plot? Or did some other grim fate befall him before he could serve a full term?

ADVERTISEMENT

That was certainly the case with Zachary Taylor, the 12th U.S. president. Inaugurated in March 1849, he spent just 16 months in office before passing away following an unspecified stomach condition. And even though his tenure was longer than those of Harrison and Garfield, Taylor is said to have achieved little of note.

ADVERTISEMENT

So far, then, we’ve seen that both illness and assassination have played a role in cutting presidential terms short. But what happened in 1849 when the so-called one-day president momentarily came to power? His name was David Rice Atchison – and his story is a pretty remarkable one.

ADVERTISEMENT

Atchison was born in August 1807 in what’s known today as Lexington, Kentucky, and he studied law in his home state before relocating to Missouri. After he opened his own firm, though, he carved out his place in history by working for Joseph Smith. Smith, in case you didn’t know, was the founder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints – otherwise known as the Mormon Church.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 1833 there was a movement to expel Smith’s followers, popularly referred to as Mormons, from Jackson County, MI. But Atchison stepped forward to defend them, winning himself a whole heap of fans in the process. And after being backed by these supporters, he was able to secure a seat in the state’s House of Representatives in 1834.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, the Mormons’ troubles weren’t over, and in 1838 the persecution escalated into all-out war. That year, Atchison joined the state militia, serving as a senior officer and helping to control the fighting that was erupting across the state. Then, after peace of a sort was reached, he went on to take a post as a judge in the state court.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ultimately, though, Atchison was destined for bigger and better things. But how did this promising career culminate in the shortest presidential term in recorded history? Well, the Kentucky native’s ascent to power began in 1843, when he was called upon to step into an empty U.S. Senate seat.

ADVERTISEMENT

Atchison, being just 36 years old, was far younger than many of the men he served alongside. But that didn’t stop him from becoming well-liked among other Democrats. In fact, in 1845 he was appointed to a significant role within the Senate. This was a key development in the bizarre saga that was to come.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, while Atchison’s support for the beleaguered Mormons may make him seem like a hero, he was actually nothing of the sort. While in the Senate, he spoke in support of slavery on numerous occasions. He also helped to bring in the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. Thanks to this legislation, the practice of slavery spread to other states – causing further friction in antebellum America.

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, according to the U.S. Senate’s own website, Atchison once went so far as to threaten violence against members of the Abolitionist movement. And while this attitude earned Atchison the dubious distinction of having a town named after him in Kansas, it also contributed to the bloodshed that consumed the state. Ultimately, then, he may have helped to fan the flames of the Civil War.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, how did a vehemently pro-slavery senator wind up as president when many were skirting around abolition? And did this issue have anything to do with the laughable length of his term? Certainly, slavery was a topic that would make or break a number of political careers over the years.

ADVERTISEMENT

In reality, though, what happened in 1849 was something altogether more bizarre. You see, during the early days of Atchinson’s stint in the Senate, the White House was occupied by President James K. Polk. However, before his election in 1844, Polk had promised to limit his tenure to just a single term.

ADVERTISEMENT

Keeping his word, Polk left office at precisely midday on March 4, 1849. According to tradition, that was when the next president, the aforementioned Zachary Taylor, should’ve been sworn in. That year, though, Inauguration Day fell on a Sunday – a day that strict Christians tend to reserve for rest.

ADVERTISEMENT

As a result, the staunchly religious Taylor pushed his inauguration ceremony back to March 5. But with Polk leaving office a day earlier, there was an undeniable gap. Does this mean someone else had been president between one man standing down and the next taking office? According to some historians, it did, and the man who filled the role was Atchison.

ADVERTISEMENT

This isn’t as far-fetched a prospect as you may think. Back in 1845, Atchison had been appointed president pro tempore of the Senate. Essentially, this meant it was his job to watch over proceedings when the vice president, who was usually in charge at the Senate, was otherwise engaged.

ADVERTISEMENT

But there was another element to Atchison’s title, and it’s this that inspired one of antebellum America’s strangest political stories. According to the laws of the time, the president pro tempore was also second in line to the presidency. So, technically, if anything had happened to both Polk and his vice president, then Atchison would have been in charge.

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course, nothing untoward happened to Polk. But he did leave a vacuum of power behind when he stepped down – one that would not be filled for 24 hours. And given that the vice president’s term would also have ended at the same juncture, that may have left Atchison as de facto leader of the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

Just seven days after Taylor’s eventual inauguration, the Virginia newspaper the Alexandria Gazette published an article seemingly confirming the bizarre theory. It read, “[Atchison] was on Sunday, by virtue of his office, president of the United States – for one day!”

ADVERTISEMENT

And in 1907 the Philadelphia Press claimed that Atchison had embraced his temporary role with gusto. The newspaper revealed, “That Senator Atchison considered himself president there was no doubt. For on Monday morning, when the Senate reassembled, he sent to the White House for the seal of the great office and signed one or two official papers as president.”

ADVERTISEMENT

That wasn’t all. According to the Senate’s official website, the article went on to claim that Atchison’s fellow Democrats had jokingly proposed he stage a coup to stop Taylor from taking power. By this point, the story of the shortest presidency ever had spread far and wide, even appearing in the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

But as is often the case, the truth isn’t quite so clear-cut. Strangely, as the Senate’s website points out, the story about Atchison’s temporary presidency didn’t feature in either the Senate Journal or the Congressional Globe at the time. Surely, one imagines, such a peculiar tale would’ve warranted extensive coverage by the press?

ADVERTISEMENT

Political historian and author George Haynes also shared his thoughts about Atchison being a forgotten president of the United States. And according to Haynes, the theory doesn’t hold weight. In reality, he claimed, the senator wasn’t even in office when the alleged scenario took place.

ADVERTISEMENT

This rebuttal seems to hinge around the idea that along with Polk’s presidency, Atchison’s senatorial position actually came to an end on March 4. And even though Atchison was reappointed to the role of president pro tempore the following day, the post was in fact unfilled during the period in question.

ADVERTISEMENT

But if neither Polk nor Atchison were president during these confusing 24 hours, then who was? Well, intriguingly, you could claim that Atchison really did fill the position – but only for a few minutes. On March 5, you see, the senator was technically reappointed to his pro tempore role immediately before Taylor was sworn in.

ADVERTISEMENT

Yet this viewpoint, while creative, is flawed. After all, the vice president is always sworn into office before the president makes his own pledge. Therefore, by extension, every second-in-command has technically been the leader of the free world – if just for a matter of minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

But what did Atchison himself make of all the fuss? Did he really believe that he’d been president of the United States for one day? Or did he dismiss such ideas as fantasy and folly? Well, according to the Senate’s website, the man at the center of the claims was actually quick to dismiss them.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the early 1880s, Atchison is reported to have written, “I never for a moment acted as president of the U.S.” That’s a pretty clear denial. Even so, it appears that Atchison wasn’t above making light of the situation. Supposedly, he once quipped that he could’ve easily have slept through his whole “presidency” had it not been for his pals, who had begun harassing him for favors.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I recollect that Senator Mangum of North Carolina suggested that I make him Secretary of State,” Atchison reportedly said in 1889 – although likely as a joke. On another occasion, he’s thought to have referred to his hypothetical term as “the honestest administration this country ever had.” In reality, though, Atchison felt that the position had remained unoccupied between Polk and Taylor’s respective tenures.

ADVERTISEMENT

And it wouldn’t have been the first time, either. Almost 30 years earlier, Inauguration Day had also fallen on a Sunday. That had caused President James Monroe to delay the proceedings for some 24 hours. So had his actions, like Polk’s, created an unexpected vacuum in the line of succession?

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the Senate’s website, Monroe’s successor, John Quincy Adams, believed that it had. He wrote, “[The delay created] a sort of interregnum during which there was no qualified person to act as president.” Some Constitutional experts have stood against this point of view, however.

ADVERTISEMENT

As several historians have pointed out, the president isn’t legally obliged to swear their oath prior to beginning their duties. With that in mind, both Monroe and Taylor would technically have assumed the role the moment that their predecessor stepped down – regardless of the date of their inauguration.

ADVERTISEMENT

But while Atchison may not have been the temporary leader of the U.S., that hasn’t stopped the tale from becoming the stuff of legend. In the Missouri town where Atchison was buried, for example, two memorials repeat the claim that he was “President of the United States for One Day.” There’s even an Atchison Presidential Library in Kansas. And although private ceremonies are now held to bypass any arguments surrounding Sunday inaugurations, the debate surrounding this disputed piece of history rages on.

ADVERTISEMENT

Aaron Burr is an even more controversial figure than Atchison, however. Famously, Burr was the third man to take on the role of vice president – only for him to plot against the country that he’d helped to found. Then, after this once-powerful politician’s scheming came to light, his career lay in tatters – never to be recovered. So, what did Burr do to make himself such an outcast? And why did he conspire against the U.S. in the first place?

ADVERTISEMENT

As history buffs know, Burr initially ran as a Democratic-Republican Party presidential candidate alongside Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson would win the race to become the American leader, of course, with Burr instead serving for four years as Jefferson’s VP. But throughout that period, the relationship between the two men was an uneasy one, filled with drama and dissent.

ADVERTISEMENT

Distrustful of his ambitious second-in-command, Jefferson eventually shut Burr off from party affairs. And even though Burr had won praise in the courtroom, he was nevertheless viewed as dangerous and untrustworthy by some fellow politicians. Then, in July 1804, he fatally shot a rival during a duel, bringing his time in office to an abrupt conclusion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Today, Burr is mostly remembered for this act, which caused the untimely death of founding father Alexander Hamilton. In the years that followed, however, he became involved in a treacherous plot that caused even more scandal than the murderous duel. And as a result, in 1807 he appeared in court accused of treason – making him one of the first in the U.S. to face such a charge.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, how did Burr’s political career come to such an acrimonious end? After all, like many of his peers, the future vice president had enjoyed a relatively privileged start in life. Born in 1756, he was the son of the College of New Jersey president Aaron Burr Sr. and his wife, Esther. Religion heavily factored into the couple’s lives; Aaron Sr. was also a Presbyterian minister, while Burr’s mother had been raised as the daughter of respected theologian Jonathan Edwards.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tragically, Burr and his sister, Sarah, were later orphaned while still children and spent their youth being passed between different homes. Yet this devastating setback didn’t stop the future vice president from being accepted into Princeton University at just 13 years old. Then, three years later, he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree, initially deciding to pursue a career in theology.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the age of 19, however, Burr began to focus on law instead, relocating to Connecticut in order to further his studies. It was there, in fact, that he first heard whispers of the Revolutionary War. And in 1775 the aspiring lawyer decided to put his plans on hold and join the Continental Army fighting for the independence of the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT

Before long, Burr proved himself to be an honorable and brave man on the battlefield, choosing the frontline over a cushy job on George Washington’s staff. In July 1777 he was therefore promoted to colonel – a position that saw him often in charge of some 300 men. But despite some successes in combat, the regiment Burr led went on to be decimated by British forces the following year.

ADVERTISEMENT

At around the same time, Burr fell ill with heat stroke, with his poor health eventually forcing him to resign from the Continental Army in March 1779. Consequently, he shifted his focus back to his legal career and went on to pass the bar in 1782 – the same year in which he married his wife, Theodosia. Burr then started out as a lawyer in New York City, as the British had at that point finally left the area.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 1784 Burr also received his first taste of politics by serving in the New York State Assembly for one year. This was followed in 1789 by his appointment as attorney general – making him the chief legal officer of the entire state. And that was by no means all. Burr’s inexorable rise through the ranks saw him elected a senator in 1791, with this being a role that he would hold for the following six years.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Burr wanted to land an even more prestigious position, leading him to run for president in the 1796 election. And while he ultimately lost out to John Adams – with both Jefferson and Thomas Pinckney also winning greater number of votes – this did not deter the future vice president from pursuing politics. And in 1799 he made a bold move that won him both power and mistrust.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the time, the Federalist party had a monopoly on banking in New York City. Keen to wield the influence associated with the industry, however, Burr tricked his rivals into supporting the establishment of a water company. Then, at the last minute, he changed the organization’s remit, creating as a consequence the Bank of the Manhattan Company. But while the sneaky move was effective, it won him a number of enemies – including Hamilton.

ADVERTISEMENT

With his newfound clout, Burr was thus able to secure support for Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican party in New York. At the 1800 election, he even appeared alongside the future president on the ballot paper. At the time, candidates simply went for the presidency, with the runner-up in the race going on to become vice president. And as it turned out, Jefferson was the party’s preferred man for the top job.

ADVERTISEMENT

But there was a problem: the contest between Jefferson and Burr ended up in a tie. And while it was clear that the party intended for Burr to take on the role of vice president, the man himself refused to concede this, meaning the election was ultimately passed to the House of Representatives. Rumors even began to suggest that Burr was part of a Federalist conspiracy – although this was never proved.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jefferson was finally inaugurated as president in 1801; the drama of the election meant, however, that he had been left with little trust in Burr. Yet although he was alienated from party affairs as a consequence, the vice president nevertheless proved himself skilled at a number of roles, including presiding over the Senate.

ADVERTISEMENT

Behind the scenes, Burr’s enemies were still bitter. Chief among them was Hamilton, who was apparently outspoken about his feelings toward his rival. In fact, he even warned his fellow Federalists that the vice president was an unscrupulous politician who was happy to change his alignment in order to further his career.

ADVERTISEMENT

This was seemingly made clear in April 1804, when The Albany Register intercepted and published a letter from the Democratic-Republican politician Charles D. Cooper. “I assert that Gen. Hamilton and Judge Kent have declared, in substance, that they looked upon Mr. Burr to be a dangerous man, and one who ought not to be trusted with the reigns of government,” the message read.

ADVERTISEMENT

As if that wasn’t bad enough, the article implied that Hamilton himself held an even lower opinion of Burr. After the letter’s publication, then, the vice president wrote to his Federalist adversary demanding a retraction of the slanderous statements. Yet Hamilton proclaimed his innocence, suggesting that the author of the letter had distorted his remarks.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, as no apology was forthcoming, Burr challenged Hamilton to a duel. Because the practice was illegal in New York, the pair arranged to meet in the neighboring state of New Jersey instead. There, the practice was also apparently against the law, although the punishments were not so severe. And on July 11, 1804, the two men duly came face to face just outside the town of Weehawken.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then, within seconds, the duel was over. While Hamilton’s bullet had missed his opponent, Burr’s shot had pierced his rival’s abdomen and damaged his internal organs. Mortally wounded, the Federalist was subsequently whisked to a friend’s home in Manhattan, where he was baptized before finally succumbing to his injuries.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the days that followed, however, a number of stories emerged that questioned the fairness of the duel. On one side, there were claims that the guns, which had been provided by Hamilton, had been rigged in the Federalist’s favor. Others argued, by contrast, that Burr had enjoyed an unfair advantage owing to the location of the sun at the chosen location.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was even suggested in some quarters that Hamilton had never intended to actually shoot Burr during the duel. And while this rumor was initially spread by media outlets that supported the deceased, it was also corroborated by witnesses and in letters penned by the Federalist before the face-off had taken place.

ADVERTISEMENT

Charged with murder in both the states of New York and New Jersey, Burr initially fled to his daughter’s home in South Carolina. As he was still technically the vice president of the United States, this time in exile couldn’t last long, however, and eventually he returned to return to Washington, D.C. to fulfill his duties. Yet the scandal of the duel followed Burr, and it would soon help spell an end to his political career.

ADVERTISEMENT

Indeed, when Jefferson campaigned for re-election in 1804, he chose to share a ballot with George Clinton rather than Burr. In March 1805, then, the vice president was removed from office. But despite his role in Hamilton’s death, Burr would never face prosecution. And after his time as Jefferson’s second-in-command, he made his way west, where destiny was waiting in a different form.

ADVERTISEMENT

In 1805 Burr traveled first to Virginia and then southwest to what is now Louisiana. Just two years previously, the United States had paid out some $15 million to acquire this French territory. And while there, Burr leased a large tract of land from the Spanish, who also controlled some parts of the region.

ADVERTISEMENT

But what Burr did next remains a matter of some mystery – much like the circumstances surrounding his duel with Hamilton. According to some reports, he hoped to establish a large settlement on his land. Was it possible, then, that the former vice president had set his hopes on an empire of his own? Or was he simply seeking a means of making his fortune?

ADVERTISEMENT

At the time, it also looked as though the relationship between the United States and Spain – which then ruled Mexico – might descend into war. Some even believed that Burr’s presence in Louisiana was intended to provoke such a conflict. And, interestingly, it later appeared that Burr had indeed been wanting to cause some disruption. It was claimed, you see, that he had wanted to join the southwestern states with Mexico and create a new republic in their place.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to History.com, Burr had floated the idea of a western “separation” in America with the British, who didn’t go for the deal. Yet the former vice president always denied having made any nefarious plans; instead, he claimed that his “settlement” in Louisiana was intended to provide a force of armed men in case of any upcoming Spanish conflict. If war broke out, he would be therefore well placed to stake a claim and keep his lands.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regardless of whatever Burr was plotting, though, he enlisted the help of General James Wilkinson. Wilkinson was both the Governor of the Louisiana Territory and commander-in-chief of the U.S. Army at New Orleans, making him a useful ally to have. But as it transpired, this relationship would prove to be the former vice president’s undoing. Trouble began brewing for Burr in 1806, when he and a number of armed men drew the attention of the authorities as they traveled en route to New Orleans.

ADVERTISEMENT

Keen to save his own skin, Wilkinson turned informant against Burr and sent word of his activities to Jefferson. Then, two days later, the president made an announcement, although he did not identify his former second-in-command by name. Instead, he stated that he had uncovered a treasonous plot; he also encouraged any guilty parties to lay aside their plans.

ADVERTISEMENT

This anonymity did not last, as on January 22, 1807, Jefferson went on to issue a statement claiming that Burr was guilty of treason. The accusation notably came before any trial had taken place, and almost immediately it drew criticism from other politicians, including the president’s predecessor John Adams. Nevertheless, Burr was arrested the following month.

ADVERTISEMENT

And during the investigation, evidence came to light to support the claims that Burr had planned to support Mexico in overthrowing Spanish rule. It appeared, too, that there was some proof he had intended to establish a dynasty in the Central American country. If true, these actions would have constituted a misdemeanor, yet Jefferson decided to pursue a charge of treason instead.

ADVERTISEMENT

Unfortunately for Jefferson, though, his determination to see his former vice president labeled a traitor hit a snag when the case finally went to court. John Marshall, the Supreme Court Chief Justice of the United States, was directing proceedings, and although he and Jefferson were actually related, there was no love lost between the two.

ADVERTISEMENT

Previously, Marshall had already dismissed a case against Burr’s associates on the grounds that they had not committed any crime in Washington, D.C. Jefferson continued to pursue his erstwhile colleague nonetheless, and so Burr was eventually sent to stand trial in Richmond, VA. In the meantime, the president dedicated a huge amount of time and resources to stacking the odds against his foe.

ADVERTISEMENT

But after Burr’s trial eventually began on August 3, 1807, it didn’t take long for Marshall to dismiss this case, too. The U.S. Constitution states, you see, that to be guilty of treason one of two circumstances must apply: either the accused confesses, or two people testify to witnessing the alleged act.

ADVERTISEMENT

As there were no witnesses to any acts of treason on Burr’s behalf, he was therefore acquitted less than a month after the trial began. And Jefferson was so furious with the outcome that he attempted to get the very Constitution itself amended. From his perspective, Marshall had allowed treasonous behavior to go unpunished, and as president he should have been able to intervene.

ADVERTISEMENT

Unsurprisingly, this proposed amendment to the Constitution never materialized. Yet although Burr was technically found not guilty, his political career was ruined. Wanting to leave the rumors behind, he caught a ship to Europe, after which he spent four years in exile. Then, finally, he returned to New York and his first passion of law.

ADVERTISEMENT

Today, Burr is remembered in a number of different ways. According to some, the lack of evidence presented in court during the former vice president’s trial proves that he was never guilty of treason. In fact, there are historians who paint Burr as an unsung hero, championing his progressiveness and support of women’s rights.

ADVERTISEMENT

Others view Burr in a less sympathetic light, believing instead that he was somewhat of a rogue. After all, there seems to be plenty of evidence to suggest that he really had planned an invasion of Mexico. Even while in exile in Europe, the wayward politician apparently sought funds to mount a second attempt to seize power in the Central American country.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whatever the truth, though, Burr was never prosecuted for his alleged crimes. Instead, he lived out his final years in New York before dying at the age of 80 in 1836. And two centuries later, the former vice president is mostly remembered for his role in Hamilton’s dramatic death. But as one of only a handful of people to ever be tried for treason in the United States, he nearly left a very different legacy behind.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT